In my current position as Editor-in-Chief of the American Naturalist, I read all kinds of reviews of scientific papers from all kinds of people. I routinely get asked, particularly by graduate students, what makes a good review. Here are a few thoughts on the subject.
Search Mindgames 2.0
Aasif Mandvi Abraham Lincoln academic rigor Adam Smith adaptation alumni Ayn Rand bad knees Barack Obama baseball better students birds-eye maple Charles Darwin cherry comedy creationism doing science economy effort Evolution exams grade inflation grades humor hypotheses impact factor Laffer curve learning maple New Hampshire President public policy religion research Sam Maloof Science scientist seminar standardized tests statistics success teaching tenure theory writing